Aligning At ISO 9001 Standard Requirements

Aligning At ISO 9001 Standard Requirements

In conformity with the explanations of international series of standards elaborated in the 2008 year, the

implementation of QMS having the requires of ISO 9001 standard on basis (included in this series) can be done

in every kind of organization, indifferent of its field of activity , size or number of personnel. This means that

SMEs can also align at these requires. Practically, this thing is not so easy accessible to all SMEs, due to their

limited resources. The success of this action depends on more elements, mainly, the following ones:

· Strong commitment and decision of top management;

· Adopting an organization structure accordingly both with business plan of SME, and with the

requirements and guides of standards from quality management field, too.

This means that SME (sector in continuously development in Romania starting from 1990) can align to

these requirements. Practical, this is not easy to aces by all SMEs, because of their limited resources.

The success of this demarche depends on several elements, mainly, the following:

· The decision and the strong commitment of the top management ;

· Adopting an organizational structure according to the business plan of SMEs, but also with the

requirements and the directions of the norm/standards in the quality management field.

· Accurate planning of the implementation project of a quality management system

· Allocation of the m a t erial, financial and human resources necessary for developing and

maintaining of the system;

· Suitable training of the personnel of the organization for the documentation and implementation of the system, but also for its supervising;

· Maintaining of an efficient communication and collaboration with business partners, first, with the

suppliers and the clients of SMEs, but also with other interested parts, including their own

personnel;

And one more remark: the success of a quality management system in a SME depends on endowment degree and on technological level of the equipments and working and controlling installation of the processes.

In conformity with the explanations of international series of standards elaborated in the 2000 year, theimplementation of QMS having the requires of ISO 9001 standard on basis (included in this series) can be donein every kind of organization, indifferent of its field of activity , size or number of personnel. This means thatSMEs can also align at these requires. Practically, this thing is not so easy accessible to all SMEs, due to theirlimited resources. The success of this action depends on more elements, mainly, the following ones:· Strong commitment and decision of top management;· Adopting an organization structure accordingly both with business plan of SME, and with therequirements and guides of standards from quality management field, too.This means that SME (sector in continuously development in Romania starting from 1990) can align tothese requirements. Practical, this is not easy to aces by all SMEs, because of their limited resources. Thesuccess of this demarche depends on several elements, mainly, the following:· The decision and the strong commitment of the top management ;· Adopting an organizational structure according to the business plan of SMEs, but also with therequirements and the directions of the norm/standards in the quality management field.· Accurate planning of the implementation project of a quality management system· Allocation of the m a t erial, financial and human resources necessary for developing andmaintaining of the system;· Suitable training of the personnel of the organization for the documentation and implementation ofthe system, but also for its supervising;· Maintaining of an efficient communication and collaboration with business partners, first, with thesuppliers and the clients of SMEs, but also with other interested parts, including their ownpersonnel;And one more remark: the success of a quality management system in a SME depends on endowmentdegree and on technological level of the equipments and working and controlling installation of the processes.

A transparent quality management system, well conceived and applied, with adequate trained and motivated personnel, will be efficient and if technological level of endowments (working, supervising, measuring and monitoring equipments of the processes and product, working environment and infrastructure) will be comparable with the level of endowment of the top firms in the same activity area, as of the organization we refer to.

So, adopting a quality management system based on the requirements of the ISO 9001 standard is a strategic decision of the top management of an organization, much more for the management of SME that first of all has to analyse very well all the necessary resources, to put in balance both the necessary costs of the implementation and sustaining in function of a quality management system and the benefits brought, then to decide advisedly. Developing a quality management system gives both direct benefits and a contribution at the cost and risk management, being important not only for organization but also for the satisfaction of its clients and other interested parts.

The decision of designing and implementation of a quality management system in SME is influenced by proposed objectives, by the demand of the market, by products and services offered, as well as by objectives tendency of developing and the continuously improving of the performances of the processes of any organization.

A quality management system contains two essential elements. First, the most critical, refers to human resources and the other necessary resources for constant delivery of the adequate products and services to the client. Second refers to the existence of “documented quality management system” that is, usually, defined by documented policies, objectives, plans, processes, procedures and fabrication standards. The documented quality management system has to reflect the planning and carrying on the activities, made by SME. Both for the audit reported to the ISO 9001 standard’s requirements but also for improving activities, will need to generate adequate registrations to document the effective performance and to demonstrate the concordance.

Top management of SME has to be aware that the implementation of a quality management system according to this standard has to be approached as a project, to which are assigned resources and which has to be managed by a defined schedule.

First step is represented by defining the objectives of the schedule with an accent on those that will bring benefits for SME. For each objective must be defined the way in which will be measured his achievement, as well as the reference level. Schedule must also establish:

· An identification, documentation and continue improving system of SME’s processes;

· Stages that must be carried out for achieving the objectives regarding to the quality of the product and for long-term improving of a quality management system of SME;

After establishing the objectives, the next decision of the top management of SME refers to the type of approaching that will appeal to [3].

There are two ways of approaching:

a) to design the whole quality management system and then to be implemented;

b) to evaluate the processes and to appeal to improving techniques to build the system step by step, starting from existing elements.

The advantage of designing the whole quality management system is represented by obtaining a distinct structure, the main disadvantage being the tendency of a theoretical approach, separated from the realities and practices of SMEs. The performances of the personnel can also suffer because of the necessity to apply simultaneous a great number of new procedures.

The essential advantage of step by step approach is that if through evaluation of processes are determined both the adequate practices and the less acceptable, the efforts can be focused on those areas that ensure a maximum benefit. This approach has the disadvantage of the tendency to achieve a quality management system that is not so well structured and so is more difficult to understand and to apply by the personnel of SME.

The optimum approach represents a combination of the two variants. So, initially it is good to be established a general structure of the quality management system and then to be established frame models for documentation of the processes. Implementation activities will have in view identification and solving the problems and then the improving key processes of SME.

Indifferent the approaching way, top management of SME can decide if the conceiving and implementation project of the quality management system will be carried out through internal forces, or will be carried out external appealing to a specialised advising. In case they appeal to an advising firm, must exist an abiding collaboration between the two firm and a well tuned up contract to which will be affixed a plain schedule, with responsibilities and achievement terms.

Designing and implementation project of the quality management system cannot ensure solving all the problems. Changing the culture of an organization takes time and patience. Project must be accomplished through a well defined series of phases, with well established terms and with objectives that can be reached.

Active Implication Of The Implementation Of Quality Management System

Active Implication Of The Implementation Of Quality Management System

Successful implementation of a quality management system is conditioned by implication of the top management of SME. ISO 9001 gives a special importance of the commitment of the top management obviously defining its role in the quality management system. It is underlined the promoting the leadership principle in practice as a base for operational the others principles of the quality management system.

The commitment and active implication of the top management are essential for developing, implementation and maintaining an efficient and efficacy quality system management, having as a final purpose ensuring an increasing clients’ satisfaction.

To achieve such a desideratum, top management must consider the following actions:

· defining the visions, policies and strategic objectives of SME;

· direct participation of the management to improving projects;

· obtaining the feedback regarding efficiency and efficacy of the processes of making the products;

· developing an environment that encourages the involving of the personnel;

· ensuring the necessary resources for achieving the objectives.

Top management defines the methods of the performances of SME to determine the stage of achievement the objectives.

These methods must allow the evaluation:

· financial performances of SME;

· performances of the processes of SME;

· client’s satisfaction, personnel’s and other interested parts’ satisfaction;

· other success factors identified by management.

Information that results from such evaluations are used as incoming elements for the analysis done by management for continue improving of the quality management system, that must ensure the base for improving

the performances of SME.

In this way, top management can demonstrate its commitment through:

· understanding the necessities and present expectations and client’s perspective;

· promoting policies and objectives for increasing the awareness and implication of the personnel in SME;

· adopting the principle of continue improving as a base principle for the processes of SME.

· Rigorous planning of all processes of SME and to operate the changes;

· ensuring an adequate background to satisfy the requirements of the interested parts.

Top management has to involve directly in identification the processes of fabrication the products because these are directly tied by SME’s success. Also, a special attention must be paid on identification of those reliance processes that affects either the efficacy and efficiency of the processes of fabrication of the products of SME, or the necessities and expectations of the interested parts.

The management of SMEs should ensure that the processes are carried out as an efficacious and efficient net. For this it should be analyzed and got at its best the interaction of all processes. In this purpose it must consider the following aspects:

· ensuring the sequence and interaction between processes are in that way designed so they allow getting the desired results;

· ensuring that incoming and outgoing elements are obvious defined and are kept under control;

· monitoring the incoming and outgoing elements to check if the processes are correlated and carried out efficacious and efficient;

· identification and administrate the risks and to turn to account the opportunities of improving

performances;

· doing the analysis of the information for continuously improving of the processes;

· designating the responsible of the processes;

· ensuring that every process is managed so that it allows the achievement of the established objectives;

· defining the necessities and expectations of the interested parts.

Top management can present proves regarding its commitment for developing and implementation of the quality management system as well as for continuously improving of its efficacy through:

· communication of the importance of satisfaction of the clients’ requirements in SME, as well as legal requirements;

· defining the policy and objectives regarding the quality;

· managing the analysis of the quality management system;

· ensuring the necessary resources for the achievement of the objectives.

One of the main tasks that top management has to accomplish refers to defining the policy in the quality field. There is no form of standard presentation, but the policy must be in such way formulated so it ensure:

· getting client’s satisfaction as a main goal;

· clarifying the way in which it is ensured the quality of the products and services of SME;

· explicit commitment of the management regarding continue improving of the quality;

· assuming by the management the responsibility regarding the achievement of the objectives regarding quality.

Policy will be implemented through the objectives regarding the quality, that should be measurable. The more participation of the top management is more direct and more visible, the more the necessary period will be shorter for establishing and implementation of the quality system management, on one hand because of the availability of the resources and on the other hand because of a less bureaucratic approach that top management of SME has in this case.

When it is decided the implementation of a quality management system or it is approved an improving schedule of this, it is vital to exist an obvious understanding of the estimated duration and necessary resources from the management. Often, the initiatives regarding the quality management system fail because of this commitment is missing, especially from the top management.

ISO 9001 Standards Video

ISO 9000 Standards - ISO 9000 Standard Software
The term ISO9000 Standards refers to a set of quality management standards. ISO9000 currently includes three quality standards: ISO 9000:2005, ISO 9001:2000, and ISO 9004:2000. ISO 9001:2000 presents requirements, while ISO 9000:2005 and ISO 9004:2000 present guidelines. All of these are process standards (not product standards).

ISO 9001 Standard 's purpose is to facilitate international trade by providing a single set of standards that people everywhere would recognize and respect.

The ISO 9001 Standards apply to all kinds of organizations in all kinds of areas. Some of these areas include manufacturing, processing, servicing, printing, forestry, electronics, steel, computing, legal services, financial services, accounting, trucking, banking, retailing, drilling, recycling, aerospace, construction, exploration, textiles, pharmaceuticals, oil and gas, pulp and paper, petrochemicals, publishing, shipping, energy, telecommunications, plastics, metals, research, health care, hospitality, utilities, pest control, aviation, machine tools, food processing, agriculture, government, education, recreation, fabrication, sanitation, software development, consumer products, transportation, design, instrumentation, tourism, communications, biotechnology, chemicals, engineering, farming, entertainment, horticulture, consulting, insurance, and so on.

KEY CONSIDERATIONS IN IMPLEMENTING ISO 9001 IN SMEs

There are many issues that must be addressed in moving the QMS from the initial state to the desired state. For example, all organizations implementing ISO 9001 will need to consider the unique culture within the organization, its size, and the resources available. Beyond those widely discussed points, three issues that merit particular attention are (1) consideration of the QMS as a parallel function, (2) training, and (3) auditing. Key points associated with these issues are discussed below.

In the case of all of the transitions depicted, real benefits from the QMS are more

likely to be experienced if the QMS is implemented directly into the core structure of the organization. SMEs must be cautious against establishing a QMS that is run separately in parallel to its other systems. In SMEs, the parallel subsystem most commonly exhibits itself as a separate Quality Assurance, or in some cases, ISO 9001 department. Possible reasons for this may include the existence of rigid departmental boundaries in some SMEs or overemphasis on core activities. As Yauch and Steudel [10] note, SMEs tend to focus their attention on “…necessary routine activities (such as sales, production, shipping, etc.) rather than activities aimed at improving processes or systems.” If a SME insists on establishing a separate quality department, its level of effectiveness can be increased by embedding the QMS in widely-used organizational systems where practical. The integration is largely a function of how well the QMS manages to share information with other subsystems and its ability to align with the policies, norms, goals, and values in place throughout the organization.

In SMEs, training and staff development is more likely to be ad hoc and small scale because of modest human and financial resources and the absence of a specific training budget. To prevent the problems arising from lack of education and training, two things must be done:

1. Education of Top Management: The centralization of decision-making processes within many SMEs means that the management can either be the main stumbling block to change or the main catalyst for change. Therefore, any approach to ISO 9001implementation must involve considerable education for the top management of the organization to create awareness and understanding of the implementation process as a change initiative. Implementing a fully functional and documented QMS requires motivation by top management to appreciate, achieve, and implement the necessary measures to meet the standards’ criteria.

2. Education and Training of Employees: SMEs are often under pressure to quickly gain ISO 9001 registration. Meeting the requirements of the standard in a short period of time can prove a formidable obstacle for a small company. Since most SMEs do not possess the needed expertise internally, they may be inclined to hire external experts to provide the necessary technical expertise and manpower. However, having a functioning and documented QMS requires more than that. It requires ensuring that all employees in the organization clearly know what is expected of them and how they can contribute to the attainment of their organizations’ goals. This will likely require the preparation and implementation of a training plan tailored specifically to the unique characteristics and maturity level of the SME.

As emphasized throughout the paper, a QMS is not going to produce the expected results unless it is fully functional. While auditing must therefore verify the existence of the necessary documentation, it must also focus on the functionality of the QMS. The measurement of the functionality and the qualitative and financial impacts of a QMS have been the subject of several studies, including Kaynak. Among the categories used to measure functionality and performance improvement, two are particularly noteworthy for our purposes: management commitment and employee involvement. A QMS cannot be functional in the absence of those two characteristics. Therefore, as a minimum, internal and external auditors should continually verify top management’s commitment to increased company-wide quality awareness and improvement in addition to employee involvement in the design, implementation, operation, and improvement of quality related processes and procedures.

What Is New In ISO 9001:2008 Standards

The new edition of ISO 9001 is an amendment and not a revision; in other words, the changes are very small. They are broadly as follows:

- the user-feedback survey on ISO 9001:2000 revealed that there were some ambiguities and some points needing clarification. These have been tidied up, along with clarification inareas that were previously too open to interpretation.

- the new edition has improved compatibility with ISO 14001 for those wishing to integrate their ISO 14001 certification with their ISO 9001 certification.

ISO 9001:2008 – What it means to certified organizations

For certified organizations, the transition period runs from 14 November 2008 to 31 December 2009. All organizations need to be compliant with ISO 9001:2008 by the end of 2009 to retain their certification. BSI’s clients will be audited against the new edition of the standard at their next continuing assessment or re-certification visit.

Antony Barrett, product marketing manager responsible for ISO 9001 at BSI Management Systems UK, comments: “We don’t see anyone having any problems in achieving the 2008 edition of the standard.” Client managers will work with clients to manage the process.

ISO 9001 — a way of managing for conformance

Quality assurance, according to the Standard, is a way of managing that prevents non-conformance and thus “assures quality”. This is what makes ISO 9001 different from other standards: it is a management standard, not a product standard. It goes beyond product standardisation: it is standardising not what is made but how it is made. To use standards to dictate and control how organisations work was to extend the role of standards to new territory. To take such a step we might have firstly established that any such requirements worked — that they resulted in ways of working which improved performance.

Yet the plausibility of this Standard, and the fact that those who had an interest in maintaining it were (and still are) leading opinion, prevented such enquiries. In simple terms the Standard asks managers to say what they do, do what they say and prove it to a third party.

ISO 9000 (1994) paragraph 1: “The requirements specified are aimed primarily at achieving customer satisfaction by preventing non-conformity at all stages from design through servicing.”

To put it another way, the Standard asserts that preventing non-conformance achieves customer satisfaction. But does it? Of course it matters to customers that a product works. But there is no guarantee that the Standard will ensure even that. Furthermore, customers take a total view of an organisation — how easy it is to do business with — in respect of all things of importance to each and every customer.

ISO 9001 requires managers to “establish and maintain a documented quality system as a means of ensuring that product conforms to specified requirements”. Loosely translated this is “say what you do”. Management is supposed to “define and document its policy for quality . . . including its commitment to quality”.

What management would not declare its commitment to quality? But would they know what it means? Would they argue (as they should) that quality management is a different and better way to do business, or would they believe that ISO 9000 will take care of quality? The Standard encourages managers to think of “quality” and “business as usual” as separate and distinct. It helps managers avoid the revelation that quality means a wholly different view of management. Instead, the organisation “shall appoint a management representative who, irrespective of other responsibilities, shall have defined authority and responsibility” [for ISO 9000]. At a practical level this means only one executive might decide he or she had better learn a thing or two about quality. However, would being responsible for ISO 9001 lead to learning about quality or simply enforcing the ISO 9000 regime in an organisation?

Key to the regime is auditing. The Standard requires organisations to conduct internal quality audits to “verify whether quality activities comply with planned arrangements”. This can be loosely translated as “do you do as you say?” and the purpose of the audit is to see that you do. It was not until the 1994 review that the words were changed to “quality activities and related results”. It was a Standard which was rooted in the philosophy of inspection: fifteen years after its initial promulgation the promoters sought to extend the focus to results. But results or improvements assessed by what means? Inspection. By the time the Standard was adopted world-wide, quality thinking had moved a long way from the philosophy of inspection. It is now understood, at least by a few, that quality is achieved through managing the organisation as a system and using measures which enable managers to improve flow and reduce variation (which we explore in chapters 5 and 7). The defenders argue that there is nothing stopping a company having ISO 9000 and implementing methods for managing flow and reducing variation, but where are such companies? Few of the companies we researched, formally and informally, knew anything about this thinking. The Standard does not talk about it; moreover, the Standard effectively discourages managers from learning about it by representing quality in a different way.

According to ISO 8402 (quality vocabulary), quality is:

“The totality of features and characteristics of a product or service that bear on its ability to satisfy stated or implied needs.”

Everything we have learned about ISO 9000 suggests that the people who created this definition were thinking about the things which need to be controlled, those things which “bear on its ability . . .”. The builders of the Standard assumed that customer needs would be listed in contractual agreements between the supplier and customer. ISO 9000 has a “make” logic — procedures for “how you do what you do” — and a “control” logic — check to see that it is done. It is a relic of the era when contractual agreements were perceived to be an important device for regulating the behaviour of suppliers. In these ways, ISO 9000 encouraged “planning for quality”.

Planning for quality sounds plausible, but it assumes many things: that the plan is the right plan, that it is feasible, that people will “do it”, that performance will improve. It is an approach which, paradoxically, leads to poor decisions. Planners of quality systems, guided by ISO 9000, start with a view of how the world should be as framed by the Standard. Understanding how an organisation is working, rather than how someone thinks it should, is a far better place from which to start change of any kind

Conduct Initial Status Survey In ISO 9001 Standards

Conduct Initial Status Survey In ISO 9001 Standards

ISO 9001 does not require duplication of effort or redundant system. The goal of ISO 9001 is to create a quality management system that conforms to the standard. This does not preclude incorporating, adapting, and adding onto quality programs already in place. So the next step in the implementation process is to compare the organization’s existing quality management system, if there is one — with the requirements of the standard (ISO 9001:2008).

For this purpose, an organization flow chart showing how information actually flows (not what should be done) from order placement by the customer to delivery to this customer should be drawn up. From this over-all flow chart, a flow chart of activities in each department should be prepared.

With the aid of the flow charts, a record of existing quality management system should be established. A significant number of written procedures may already be in place.

Unless they are very much out of date, these documents should not be discarded.

Rather, they should be incorporated into the new quality management system.

Documents requiring modification or elaboration should be identified and listed. This exercise is some times referred to as ” gap analysis”. During these review processes, wide consultation with executives and representatives of various unions and associations within the organization is required to enlist their active cooperation.

In the review process, documents should be collected, studied and registered for

further use, possibly after they have been revised. Before developing new quality

management system documentation, you need to consider with which quality

requirements or department you should start. The best is to select an area where

processes are fairly well organized, running effectively and functioning satisfactorily.

The basic approach is to determine and record how a process is currently carried out.

We can do this by identifying the people involved and obtaining information from them during individual interviews. Unfortunately, it often happens that different people will give different, contradicting versions of a process. Each one may refer to oral instructions that are not accurate or clear. This is why the facts are often not described correctly the first time around, and have to be revised several times.

Once it has been agreed how to describe the current process, this process has to be adapted, supplemented and implemented according to the requirements of the quality standard (ISO 9001:2008). This requires organizational arrangements, the drawing up of additional documents and possible removal of existing documentation (e.g. procedures, inspection/test plans, inspection/test instructions) and records (e.g. inspection/test reports, inspection/test certificates).

In introducing a quality management system, the emphasis is on the improvement of the existing processes or the re-organization of processes.

In general, the steps to follow are the following:

a. Ascertain and establish the following:

What is the present operation/process? What already exists?

b. Analyze the relevant sections of the quality standard – ISO 9001:2008:

What is actually required?

c. If necessary, supplement and change operational arrangements in accordance

with the standard, develop documents and records, and describe operations/

processes:

What is the desired operation/process?

The gap analysis can be done internally, if the knowledge level is there. Or a formal pre-assessment can be obtained from any one of a large number of ISO 9001 consulting, implementing, and registration firms.