ISO 9000 Standards Document Control System

ISO 9000 Standards Document Control System
The ISO 9000 Standards requires that a documented procedure be established to define the controls needed.

This requirement means that the methods for performing the various activities required to control different types of documents should be defined and documented.

Although the ISO 9000 standards implies that a single procedure is required, should you choose to produce several different procedures for handling the different types of documents it is doubtful that any auditor would deem this noncompliant. Where this might be questionable is in cases where there is no logical reason for such differences and where merging the procedures and settling on a best practice would improve efficiency and effectiveness.

Documents are recorded information and the purpose of the document control process is to firstly ensure the appropriate information is available where needed and secondly to prevent the inadvertent use of invalid
information. At each stage of the process are activities to be performed that may require documented procedures in order to ensure consistency and predictability. Procedures may not be necessary for each stage in the process.

ISO 9000 Standards Document Control System

ISO 9000 Standards Document Control System
The ISO 9000 Standards requires that a documented procedure be established to define the controls needed.

This requirement means that the methods for performing the various activities required to control different types of documents should be defined and documented.

Although the ISO 9000 standards implies that a single procedure is required, should you choose to produce several different procedures for handling the different types of documents it is doubtful that any auditor would deem this noncompliant. Where this might be questionable is in cases where there is no logical reason for such differences and where merging the procedures and settling on a best practice would improve efficiency and effectiveness.

Documents are recorded information and the purpose of the document control process is to firstly ensure the appropriate information is available where needed and secondly to prevent the inadvertent use of invalid
information. At each stage of the process are activities to be performed that may require documented procedures in order to ensure consistency and predictability. Procedures may not be necessary for each stage in the process.

Aligning At ISO 9001 Standard Requirements

Aligning At ISO 9001 Standard Requirements

In conformity with the explanations of international series of standards elaborated in the 2008 year, the

implementation of QMS having the requires of ISO 9001 standard on basis (included in this series) can be done

in every kind of organization, indifferent of its field of activity , size or number of personnel. This means that

SMEs can also align at these requires. Practically, this thing is not so easy accessible to all SMEs, due to their

limited resources. The success of this action depends on more elements, mainly, the following ones:

· Strong commitment and decision of top management;

· Adopting an organization structure accordingly both with business plan of SME, and with the

requirements and guides of standards from quality management field, too.

This means that SME (sector in continuously development in Romania starting from 1990) can align to

these requirements. Practical, this is not easy to aces by all SMEs, because of their limited resources.

The success of this demarche depends on several elements, mainly, the following:

· The decision and the strong commitment of the top management ;

· Adopting an organizational structure according to the business plan of SMEs, but also with the

requirements and the directions of the norm/standards in the quality management field.

· Accurate planning of the implementation project of a quality management system

· Allocation of the m a t erial, financial and human resources necessary for developing and

maintaining of the system;

· Suitable training of the personnel of the organization for the documentation and implementation of the system, but also for its supervising;

· Maintaining of an efficient communication and collaboration with business partners, first, with the

suppliers and the clients of SMEs, but also with other interested parts, including their own

personnel;

And one more remark: the success of a quality management system in a SME depends on endowment degree and on technological level of the equipments and working and controlling installation of the processes.

In conformity with the explanations of international series of standards elaborated in the 2000 year, theimplementation of QMS having the requires of ISO 9001 standard on basis (included in this series) can be donein every kind of organization, indifferent of its field of activity , size or number of personnel. This means thatSMEs can also align at these requires. Practically, this thing is not so easy accessible to all SMEs, due to theirlimited resources. The success of this action depends on more elements, mainly, the following ones:· Strong commitment and decision of top management;· Adopting an organization structure accordingly both with business plan of SME, and with therequirements and guides of standards from quality management field, too.This means that SME (sector in continuously development in Romania starting from 1990) can align tothese requirements. Practical, this is not easy to aces by all SMEs, because of their limited resources. Thesuccess of this demarche depends on several elements, mainly, the following:· The decision and the strong commitment of the top management ;· Adopting an organizational structure according to the business plan of SMEs, but also with therequirements and the directions of the norm/standards in the quality management field.· Accurate planning of the implementation project of a quality management system· Allocation of the m a t erial, financial and human resources necessary for developing andmaintaining of the system;· Suitable training of the personnel of the organization for the documentation and implementation ofthe system, but also for its supervising;· Maintaining of an efficient communication and collaboration with business partners, first, with thesuppliers and the clients of SMEs, but also with other interested parts, including their ownpersonnel;And one more remark: the success of a quality management system in a SME depends on endowmentdegree and on technological level of the equipments and working and controlling installation of the processes.

A transparent quality management system, well conceived and applied, with adequate trained and motivated personnel, will be efficient and if technological level of endowments (working, supervising, measuring and monitoring equipments of the processes and product, working environment and infrastructure) will be comparable with the level of endowment of the top firms in the same activity area, as of the organization we refer to.

So, adopting a quality management system based on the requirements of the ISO 9001 standard is a strategic decision of the top management of an organization, much more for the management of SME that first of all has to analyse very well all the necessary resources, to put in balance both the necessary costs of the implementation and sustaining in function of a quality management system and the benefits brought, then to decide advisedly. Developing a quality management system gives both direct benefits and a contribution at the cost and risk management, being important not only for organization but also for the satisfaction of its clients and other interested parts.

The decision of designing and implementation of a quality management system in SME is influenced by proposed objectives, by the demand of the market, by products and services offered, as well as by objectives tendency of developing and the continuously improving of the performances of the processes of any organization.

A quality management system contains two essential elements. First, the most critical, refers to human resources and the other necessary resources for constant delivery of the adequate products and services to the client. Second refers to the existence of “documented quality management system” that is, usually, defined by documented policies, objectives, plans, processes, procedures and fabrication standards. The documented quality management system has to reflect the planning and carrying on the activities, made by SME. Both for the audit reported to the ISO 9001 standard’s requirements but also for improving activities, will need to generate adequate registrations to document the effective performance and to demonstrate the concordance.

Top management of SME has to be aware that the implementation of a quality management system according to this standard has to be approached as a project, to which are assigned resources and which has to be managed by a defined schedule.

First step is represented by defining the objectives of the schedule with an accent on those that will bring benefits for SME. For each objective must be defined the way in which will be measured his achievement, as well as the reference level. Schedule must also establish:

· An identification, documentation and continue improving system of SME’s processes;

· Stages that must be carried out for achieving the objectives regarding to the quality of the product and for long-term improving of a quality management system of SME;

After establishing the objectives, the next decision of the top management of SME refers to the type of approaching that will appeal to [3].

There are two ways of approaching:

a) to design the whole quality management system and then to be implemented;

b) to evaluate the processes and to appeal to improving techniques to build the system step by step, starting from existing elements.

The advantage of designing the whole quality management system is represented by obtaining a distinct structure, the main disadvantage being the tendency of a theoretical approach, separated from the realities and practices of SMEs. The performances of the personnel can also suffer because of the necessity to apply simultaneous a great number of new procedures.

The essential advantage of step by step approach is that if through evaluation of processes are determined both the adequate practices and the less acceptable, the efforts can be focused on those areas that ensure a maximum benefit. This approach has the disadvantage of the tendency to achieve a quality management system that is not so well structured and so is more difficult to understand and to apply by the personnel of SME.

The optimum approach represents a combination of the two variants. So, initially it is good to be established a general structure of the quality management system and then to be established frame models for documentation of the processes. Implementation activities will have in view identification and solving the problems and then the improving key processes of SME.

Indifferent the approaching way, top management of SME can decide if the conceiving and implementation project of the quality management system will be carried out through internal forces, or will be carried out external appealing to a specialised advising. In case they appeal to an advising firm, must exist an abiding collaboration between the two firm and a well tuned up contract to which will be affixed a plain schedule, with responsibilities and achievement terms.

Designing and implementation project of the quality management system cannot ensure solving all the problems. Changing the culture of an organization takes time and patience. Project must be accomplished through a well defined series of phases, with well established terms and with objectives that can be reached.

Active Implication Of The Implementation Of Quality Management System

Active Implication Of The Implementation Of Quality Management System

Successful implementation of a quality management system is conditioned by implication of the top management of SME. ISO 9001 gives a special importance of the commitment of the top management obviously defining its role in the quality management system. It is underlined the promoting the leadership principle in practice as a base for operational the others principles of the quality management system.

The commitment and active implication of the top management are essential for developing, implementation and maintaining an efficient and efficacy quality system management, having as a final purpose ensuring an increasing clients’ satisfaction.

To achieve such a desideratum, top management must consider the following actions:

· defining the visions, policies and strategic objectives of SME;

· direct participation of the management to improving projects;

· obtaining the feedback regarding efficiency and efficacy of the processes of making the products;

· developing an environment that encourages the involving of the personnel;

· ensuring the necessary resources for achieving the objectives.

Top management defines the methods of the performances of SME to determine the stage of achievement the objectives.

These methods must allow the evaluation:

· financial performances of SME;

· performances of the processes of SME;

· client’s satisfaction, personnel’s and other interested parts’ satisfaction;

· other success factors identified by management.

Information that results from such evaluations are used as incoming elements for the analysis done by management for continue improving of the quality management system, that must ensure the base for improving

the performances of SME.

In this way, top management can demonstrate its commitment through:

· understanding the necessities and present expectations and client’s perspective;

· promoting policies and objectives for increasing the awareness and implication of the personnel in SME;

· adopting the principle of continue improving as a base principle for the processes of SME.

· Rigorous planning of all processes of SME and to operate the changes;

· ensuring an adequate background to satisfy the requirements of the interested parts.

Top management has to involve directly in identification the processes of fabrication the products because these are directly tied by SME’s success. Also, a special attention must be paid on identification of those reliance processes that affects either the efficacy and efficiency of the processes of fabrication of the products of SME, or the necessities and expectations of the interested parts.

The management of SMEs should ensure that the processes are carried out as an efficacious and efficient net. For this it should be analyzed and got at its best the interaction of all processes. In this purpose it must consider the following aspects:

· ensuring the sequence and interaction between processes are in that way designed so they allow getting the desired results;

· ensuring that incoming and outgoing elements are obvious defined and are kept under control;

· monitoring the incoming and outgoing elements to check if the processes are correlated and carried out efficacious and efficient;

· identification and administrate the risks and to turn to account the opportunities of improving

performances;

· doing the analysis of the information for continuously improving of the processes;

· designating the responsible of the processes;

· ensuring that every process is managed so that it allows the achievement of the established objectives;

· defining the necessities and expectations of the interested parts.

Top management can present proves regarding its commitment for developing and implementation of the quality management system as well as for continuously improving of its efficacy through:

· communication of the importance of satisfaction of the clients’ requirements in SME, as well as legal requirements;

· defining the policy and objectives regarding the quality;

· managing the analysis of the quality management system;

· ensuring the necessary resources for the achievement of the objectives.

One of the main tasks that top management has to accomplish refers to defining the policy in the quality field. There is no form of standard presentation, but the policy must be in such way formulated so it ensure:

· getting client’s satisfaction as a main goal;

· clarifying the way in which it is ensured the quality of the products and services of SME;

· explicit commitment of the management regarding continue improving of the quality;

· assuming by the management the responsibility regarding the achievement of the objectives regarding quality.

Policy will be implemented through the objectives regarding the quality, that should be measurable. The more participation of the top management is more direct and more visible, the more the necessary period will be shorter for establishing and implementation of the quality system management, on one hand because of the availability of the resources and on the other hand because of a less bureaucratic approach that top management of SME has in this case.

When it is decided the implementation of a quality management system or it is approved an improving schedule of this, it is vital to exist an obvious understanding of the estimated duration and necessary resources from the management. Often, the initiatives regarding the quality management system fail because of this commitment is missing, especially from the top management.

Why do organizations implement ISO 9000 systems?

Why do organizations implement ISO 9000 systems?

More often than not, organizations get ISO 9000 because certain customers force them or encourage them to. In many market sectors—electronics, pulp and paper, telecommunications, automobile manufacturing, defense—major customers have mandated ISO 9000 registration to their key suppliers. Similarly, some overseas regulatory bodies mandate ISO 9000 for the makers of qualitysensitive products (such as medical devices).

Many of these major customers impose ISO 9000 systems in place of, or in addition to, specific quality programs, requirements, specifications, and so on that have been in place for many years. The ISO 9000Standard becomes a key part of the relationship between the customer and its suppliers.

ISO 9000 is not, however, meant to replace customer-specific requirements in any market segment. Rather, ISO 9000 is meant to be a floor: a basic set of generic requirements. They are generic enough to apply to virtually all supplier/customer relationships anywhere in the world. It matters not the size of the supplier, the location of the customer, or the nationalities involved.

In some industrial segments, formalized standards have been created, adding to the generic ISO 9000requirements additional clauses that are industry specific. Examples include:

_ Automotive (QS-9000).

_ Aerospace (AS-9000).

_ Telecommunications (TL-9000).

To the extent that ISO 9000 replaces customer-specific quality programs and supporting audit/oversight activities, it can relieve both customers and suppliers of a great deal of redundancy, duplication, and waste of resources. The fundamental requirements are understood, agreed to, and (usually) confirmed by objective third-party audit. This gives customers confidence in the integrity and effectiveness of their supplier’s basic quality practices. The customer and supplier can then invest their energies and resources in agreeing to and working on the specific requirements unique to their relationship.

To some, ISO 9000 sounds like a mandatory, gun-to-your-head, my-way-or-the-highway program. For many suppliers, it is exactly that (“get ISO 9000 or get lost”). For many others, it is perceived that way:

“They’re trying to tell us how to run our businesses.”

But the goal of ISO 9000 is not to strengthen customers’ control over how their suppliers run their businesses. The goal is to give customers confidence in the ability of suppliers to meet their needs, resulting in satisfied customers, and growing and prosperous suppliers.

Admittedly, implementing ISO 9000 does not guarantee this. Like most things, what you get out of it depends on what you put into it. You can implement a compliant ISO 9000 system that is all cost and no benefit and it’s even possible to pass registration audit this way. This happens, usually, when the supplier’s approach is to try to:

_ Squeak by.

_ Do just enough to get registered.

_ Get this thing done without changing how we work.

But suppliers who implement ISO 9000 fully—to the spirit, as well as the letter—can and do achieve real benefits.

Managing Processes In ISO 9000 Standards

Managing Processes In ISO 9000 Standards

The ISO 9000 Standard requires the organization to manage the identified processes in accordance with the requirements of ISO 9001.

The first stage in managing a process is to establish what it is you are trying to achieve, what requirements you need to satisfy, what goals you are aiming at; then establish how you will measure your achievements. The next stage is to define the process you will employ to deliver the results. Managing the process then involves managing all the inherent characteristics of the process in such a manner that the requirements of customers and interested parties are fulfilled by the process outcomes. This means:

Managing the process inputs

Managing the work

Managing the physical resources

Managing the financial resources

Managing the human resources

Managing the constraints

Managing the outputs

Process management is therefore much more than managing activities and therefore when describing processes, one needs more than a flow chart of activities. The chart is a diagrammatical representation of a process but only one aspect. One can also add numerical data to the charts to indicate resources, cycle times, delays, costs etc. but the intangible factors of the human environment cannot be reduced to numerical data to add to the charts.

The notes to clause 4.1 of ISO 9001 need some explanation. It is stated that the processes needed for the management system include management activities, provision of resources, product realization and measurement. This note could cause confusion because it suggests that these are the processes that are needed for the management system. It would be unwise to use this as the model and far better to identify the processes from observing how the business operates. The term provision of resources should be Resource Management, which is the collection of processes covering financial, human and physical resources.

Product realization is also a collection of processes such as design, production, service delivery, etc. Measurement is not a single process but a sub-process within each process. Grouping all the measurement processes together serves no useful purpose except it matches the standard – a purpose of little value in managing the organization.

The second note refers to outsourcing processes although it is difficult to imagine that management activities, product realization or measurement would be outsourced in its entirety. It is likely that market research; design, product verification, equipment calibration and other specialized services may be outsourced. While outsourcing comes under purchasing, it is correct to point out that the organization should control any outsourced processes. The supplier of the process is usually referred to as a subcontractor because they provide services to the organization’s requirements not their own. Control of subcontractors is covered by clause 7.4 but in meeting clause 7.4.3, you need to treat suppliers and subcontractors differently.

ISO 9000 Standards – Conducting Management Reviews

ISO 9000 Standards – Conducting Management Reviews

The ISO 9000 standards requires that top management conduct

management reviews.

The term review is defined in ISO 9001 as an activity

undertaken to ensure the suitability, adequacy, effective-

ness and efficiency of the subject matter to achieve

established objectives. The addition of the term manage-

ment means that the management review can be

perceived as a review of management rather than a

review by management, although both meanings are conveyed in the standard.

The rationale for this is that the examples given in ISO 9000 such as design

review and nonconformity review clearly indicate it is design and non-

conformity that is being reviewed. If the system was to be reviewed then the

action should be called a system review. It is no doubt unintentional in the

standard but, if the management system is perceived as the way in which the

organization’s objectives are achieved, a review of management is in fact a

review of the way achievement of objectives is being managed because the

organization exists to achieve objectives and so both meanings are correct.

Top management will not regard the management review as important unless

they believe it is essential to running the business. The way to do this is to treat

it as a business performance review. This is simpler than it may appear. If the

quality policy is now accepted as corporate policy and the quality objectives

are accepted as corporate objectives, any review of the management system

becomes a performance review and no different to any other executive

meeting. The problem with the former management reviews was that they

allowed discussion on the means for achieving objectives to take place in other

management meetings leaving the management review to a review of errors,

mistakes and documentation that no one was interested in anyway. The

management system is the means for achieving objectives therefore it makes

sense to review the means when reviewing the ends so that actions are linked to

results and commitment secured for all related changes in one transaction.

The requirement emphasizes that top management conduct the review – not

the quality manager, not the operational manager – but top management – those

who direct and control the organization at the highest level. In many ISO 9000

registered organizations, the management review is a chore, an event held once

each year, on a Friday afternoon before a national holiday – perhaps a cynical

view but nonetheless often true. The reason the event has such a low priority

is that management have not understood what the review is all about. Tell

them it’s about reviewing nonconformities, customer complaints and internal

audit records and you will be lucky if anyone turns up. The quality manager

produces all the statistics so the others managers are free of any burden. By

careful tactics, these managers may come away with no actions, having

delegated any in their quarter to the quality manager.

In order to provide evidence of its commitment to conducting management

reviews, management would need to demonstrate that it planned for the

reviews, prepared input material in the form of performance results, metrics

and explanations, decided what to do about the results and accepted action to

bring about improvement.

The ISO 9000 standards requires that top management conduct management reviews.

The term review is defined in ISO 9000 Standards as an activity undertaken to ensure the suitability, adequacy, effectiveness and efficiency of the subject matter to achieve established objectives. The addition of the term management means that the management review can be perceived as a review of management rather than a review by management, although both meanings are conveyed in the standard.

The rationale for this is that the examples given in ISO 9000 Standards such as design review and nonconformity review clearly indicate it is design and non-conformity that is being reviewed. If the system was to be reviewed then the action should be called a system review. It is no doubt unintentional in the standard but, if the management system is perceived as the way in which the organization’s objectives are achieved, a review of management is in fact a review of the way achievement of objectives is being managed because the organization exists to achieve objectives and so both meanings are correct.

Top management will not regard the management review as important unless they believe it is essential to running the business. The way to do this is to treat it as a business performance review. This is simpler than it may appear. If the quality policy is now accepted as corporate policy and the quality objectives are accepted as corporate objectives, any review of the management system becomes a performance review and no different to any other executive meeting. The problem with the former management reviews was that they allowed discussion on the means for achieving objectives to take place in other management meetings leaving the management review to a review of errors, mistakes and documentation that no one was interested in anyway. The management system is the means for achieving objectives therefore it makes sense to review the means when reviewing the ends so that actions are linked to results and commitment secured for all related changes in one transaction.

The requirement emphasizes that top management conduct the review – not the quality manager, not the operational manager – but top management – those who direct and control the organization at the highest level. In many ISO 9000 registered organizations, the management review is a chore, an event held once each year, on a Friday afternoon before a national holiday – perhaps a cynical view but nonetheless often true. The reason the event has such a low priority is that management have not understood what the review is all about. Tell them it’s about reviewing nonconformities, customer complaints and internal audit records and you will be lucky if anyone turns up. The quality manager produces all the statistics so the others managers are free of any burden. By careful tactics, these managers may come away with no actions, having delegated any in their quarter to the quality manager.

In order to provide evidence of its commitment to conducting management reviews, management would need to demonstrate that it planned for the reviews, prepared input material in the form of performance results, metrics and explanations, decided what to do about the results and accepted action to bring about improvement.