ISO 9001 Standards – Quality Management Principles

ISO 9001 Standards – Quality Management Principles

A quality management principle is defined by ISO/TC 176 as a comprehensive and fundamental rule or belief, for leading and operating an organization, aimed at continually improving performance over the long term by focusing on customers while addressing the needs of all other interested parties. Eight principles have emerged as fundamental to the management of quality.

All the requirements of ISO 9001:2008 are related to one or more of these principles. These principles provide the reasons for the requirements and are thus very important. The quality management principles can be listed as below:

1. Customer focus
Organizations depend on their customers and therefore should understand current and future customer needs, meet customer requirements and strive to exceed customer expectations.
The customer focus principle is reflected in ISO 9001 Standards through the requirements addressing:
a. Communication with the customer
b. Care for customer property
c. The determination of customer needs and expectations
d. Appointment of a management representative
e. Management commitment

2. Leadership
Leaders establish unity of purpose and direction for the organization. They should create and maintain the internal environment in which people can become fully involved in achieving the organization’s objectives.
The leadership principle is reflected in ISO 9001 Standards through the requirements addressing:
a. The setting of objectives and policies
b. Planning
c. Internal communication
d. Creating an effective work environment

3. Involvement of people
People at all levels are the essence of an organization and their full involvement enables their abilities to be used for the organization’s benefit.
The involvement of people principle is reflected in ISO 9001 Standards through the requirements addressing:
a. Participation in design reviews
b. Defining objectives, responsibilities and authority
c. Creating an environment in which people are motivated
d. Internal communication
e. Identifying competence needs

4. Process approach
A desired result is achieved more efficiently when related resources and activities are managed as a process.
The process approach principle is reflected in ISO 9001 Standards through the requirements addressing:
a. The identity of processes
b. Defining process inputs and outputs
c. Providing the infrastructure, information and resources for processes to
function

5. System approach to management
This principle is expressed as follows:
Identifying, understanding and managing interrelated processes as a system contributes to the organization’s effectiveness and efficiency in achieving its objectives.
The system approach principle is reflected in ISO 9001 through the requirements addressing:
a. Establishing, implementing and maintaining the management system
b. Interconnection, interrelation and sequence of processes
c. The links between processes
d. Establishing measurement processes

6. Continual improvement
This principle is expressed as follows:
Continual improvement of the organization’s overall performance should be a permanent objective of the organization.
The continual improvement principle is reflected in ISO 9001 Standards through the requirements addressing:
a. Improvement processes
b. Identifying improvements
c. Reviewing documents and processes for opportunities for improvement

7. Factual approach to decision making
This principle is expressed as follows:
Effective decisions are based on the analysis of data and information.
The factual approach principle is reflected in ISO 9001 Standards through the requirements addressing:
a. Reviews, measurements and monitoring to obtain facts
b. Control of measuring devices
c. Analysis to obtain facts from information
d. Records for documenting the facts
e. Approvals based on facts

8. Mutually beneficial supplier relationships
This principle is expressed as follows:
An organization and its suppliers are interdependent and a mutually beneficial relationship enhances the ability of both to create value.
The mutually beneficial supplier relationships principle is reflected in ISO 9001 Standardsthrough the requirements addressing:
a. Control of suppliers
b. Evaluation of suppliers
c. Analysis and review of supplier data

ISO 9001 Standards – Retention Of Records

ISO 9001 Standards – Retention Of Records

It is important that records are not destroyed before their useful life is over.
There are several factors to consider when determining the retention time for records.
The duration of the contract – some records are only of value whilst the contract is in force.
The life of the product – access to the records will probably not be needed for some considerable time, possibly long after the contract has closed. On defence contracts the contractor has to keep records for up to 20 years and
for product liability purposes, in the worst-case situation (taking account of
appeals) you could be asked to produce records up to 17 years after you made the product.
The period between management system assessments – assessors may wish to see evidence that corrective actions from the last assessment were taken. If the period of assessment is three years and you dispose of the evidence after 2 years, you will have some difficulty in convincing the assessor that you corrected the deficiency.
You will also need to take account of the subcontractor records and ensure
adequate retention times are invoked in the contract.
Where the retention time is actually specified can present a problem. If you
specify it in a general procedure you are likely to want to prescribe a single
figure, say 5 years for all records. However, this may cause storage problems – it may be more appropriate therefore to specify the retention times in the procedures that describe the records. In this way you can be selective.
You will also need a means of determining when the retention time has
expired so that if necessary you can dispose of the records. The retention time doesn’t mean that you must dispose of them when the time expires – only that you must retain the records for at least that stated period. Not only will the records need to be dated but the files that contain the records need to be dated and if stored in an archive, the shelves or drawers also dated. It is for this reason that all documents should carry a date of origin and this requirement needs to be specified in the procedures that describe the records. If you can rely on the selection process a simple method is to store the records in bins or computer disks that carry the date of disposal.
While the ISO 9001 requirement applies only to records, you may also need to retain tools, jigs, fixtures, test software – in fact anything that is needed to repair or reproduce equipment in order to honour your long-term commitments.
Should the customer specify a retention period greater than what you
prescribe in your procedures, special provisions will need to be made and this is a potential area of risk. Customers may choose not to specify a particular time and require you to seek approval before destruction. Any contract that requires you to do something different creates a problem in conveying the requirements to those who are to implement them. The simple solution is to persuade your customer to accept your policy. You may not want to change your procedures for one contract. If you can’t change the contract, the only alternative is to issue special instructions. You may be better off storing the records in a special contract store away from the normal store or alternatively attach special labels to the files to alert the people looking after the archives.

Develop Quality Management System Documentation In ISO 9001 Standards

Develop Quality Management System Documentation In ISO 9001 Standards
Documentation is the most common area of non-conformance among organizations wishing to implement ISO 9000 quality management systems. As one company pointed out: “When we started our implementation, we found that documentation was inadequate. Even absent, in some areas. Take calibration. Obviously it’s necessary, and obviously we do it, but it wasn’t being documented. Another area was inspection and testing. We inspect and test practically every item that leaves here, but our documentation was inadequate”.
Documentation of the quality management system should include:
1. Documented statements of a quality policy and quality objectives,
2. A quality manual,
3. Documented procedures and records required by the standard ISO 9001:2008, and
4. Documents needed by the organization to ensure the effective planning, operation and control of its processes.

Quality documentation is generally prepared in the three levels indicated below that follows. Use ISO 10013:1995 for guidance in quality documentation.

Level A: Quality manual
States the scope of the quality management system, including exclusions and details of their justification; and describes the processes of the quality management system and their interaction. Generally gives an organization profile; presents the organizational relationships and responsibilities of persons whose work affects quality and outlines the main procedures. It may also describe organization’s quality policy and quality objectives.

Level B: Quality management system procedures
Describes the activities of individual departments, how quality is controlled in each department and the checks that are carried out.

Level C: Quality documents (forms, reports, work instructions, etc.)
1. Work instructions describe in detail how specific tasks are performed; include drawing standards, methods of tests, customer’s specifications, etc.
2. Presents forms to be used for recording observations, etc.

What is ISO 9001 Standard

What is ISO 9001 Standard?

Outsourced Processes In ISO 9001 Standards

Outsourced Processes In ISO 9001 Standards

One of the changes in ISO 9001:2008 is clarification of the role of outsourced processes in a quality management system. Guidance on ‘Outsourced processes’ helps clarify the intent and shows the linkage between Clause 4.2, where outsourced processes appear, and the purchasing controls in clause 7.4.
An outsourced process is a process that the organization needs for its quality management system and is performed by an external party. This party could be another company, a corporate service, another division, etc.
The organization needs to ensure the outsourced process is conducted in accordance with ISO 9001:2008 and other requirements of the quality management system. This brings in the purchasing controls of 7.4. The service may not be purchased in the traditional sense of a monetary transaction. The guidance document explains that the controls in clause 4.2 and 7.4 apply. For example, a “no charge” service from a corporate head office requires documentation of supplier selection and, most importantly, control.
The guidance document addresses two important cases and gives guidance on the appropriate level of control. The cases are:
• The organization has the competence and ability to carry out a process, but chooses to outsource it (for commercial or other reasons).
• The organization does not have the competence to carry out the process itself, and chooses to outsource it.

Demonstrating conformity with ISO 9001:2008

Demonstrating conformity with ISO 9001:2008

For organizations wishing to demonstrate conformity with the requirements of ISO 9001:2008, for the purposes of certification/registration, contractual, or other reasons, it is important to remember the need to provide evidence of the effective implementation of the QMS.
Organizations may be able to demonstrate conformity without the need for extensive documentation.
To claim conformity with ISO 9001:2008, the organization has to be able to provide objective evidence of the effectiveness of its processes and its quality management system. Clause 3.8.1 of ISO 9000:2005 defines “objective evidence” as “data supporting the existence or variety of something” and notes that “objective evidence may be obtained through observation, measurement, test, or other means.”
Objective evidence does not necessarily depend on the existence of documented procedures, records or other documents, except where specifically mentioned in ISO 9001:2008. In some cases, (for example, in clause 7.1(d)
Planning of product realization, and clause 8.2.4

Monitoring and measurement of product), it is up to the organization to determine what records are necessary in order to provide this objective evidence.
Where the organization has no specific internal procedure for a particular activity, and this is not required by the standard, (for example, clause 5.6 Management Review), it is acceptable for this activity to be conducted using as a basis the relevant clause of ISO 9001:2008. In these situations, both internal and external audits may use the text of ISO 9001:2008 for conformity assessment purposes.

Transition from ISO 9001:2000 to ISO 9001:2008

Transition from ISO 9001:2000 to ISO 9001:2008
This reference guide was developed to help you understand the nature of the changes to the ISO 9001 standard.
Clause Change/Emphasis Not Auditable
0.1 General – Added language emphasizing statutory and regulatory requirements are a concern as it relates to products for this international standard.
0.4 Compatibility with Other Management Systems Standards - Emphasis was added on the consideration given to ISO 14001:2004 to ensure that the standards are compatible.
1.1 General
1.2 Application – “Statutory” was added in certain paragraphs to ensure the user is aware that these requirements must be taken into consideration. Additional notes were added to explain that where the word “product” appears, it refers to every stage of its existence, from raw material received to the final product being shipped to the customer.
2. Normative Reference – Reference to ISO 9000 (vocabulary and concepts) was updated to refer to the current revision (i.e. ISO 9000:2005).
3. Terms and Definitions – The supplier/organization/customer model was removed. These relationships, in reality, are not always linears.
The Auditable RequirementsClause Change/Emphasis4.1In 4.1 a, “identify” was replaced with “determine” to emphasize that an organization must give careful consideration to what processes are needed in order to fulfill requirements.A link is drawn to 7.4 in the additional note. This was done to show that the supplier approval, evaluation, and re-evaluation process is where evidence of controlled outsourced processes should be demonstrated.4.2.1References to records and documents were consolidated.Also, the organization can require records not specified in this international standard that are created and maintained.4.2.3Clarification is given to the requirement for outsourced documents. Only those needed for the planning and operation of the QMS need to be controlled. This could exclude documents related to occupational health and safety since ISO 9001 contains requirements only concerned with product (see 0.1).4.2.4Rephrased, but no additional clarifications or emphasis added. Editorial change only.5.5.2The management representative must be from the organization’s management. This would exclude consultants and other individuals external to the organization (e.g. a management representative from the corporate entity). The purpose of this is to ensure that this individual, entrusted with the responsibilities of championing the quality management system, is not “out of touch” with the organization.6.2.1The boundaries of competence only extend to individuals who impact product conformity. However, this does not just include those who are directly involved in production. The decisions made by management affect product conformity; therefore, they must be competent as well.
6.2.2If said personnel have not yet attained the competence needed to perform the assigned job, then the organization must provide training or some other remedy to ensure that competence is achieved. The organization must also have a mechanism to ensure that personnel have been evaluated based on how well they demonstrate their knowledge and skill (i.e. competence). It is not enough to merely provide training or consider an individual’s experience. The organization must prove to itself that this person can, in fact, perform.6.3Infrastructure also includes databases and information technology.6.4Emphasis is added in a note to highlight that the concept of “work environment” only extends to product quality.7.1 c“Measurement” is added.7.2.1“Post-delivery activity” is clarified in a note with examples.7.3.1A note emphasizes that design verification, validation, and review are different from one another and serve different purposes. Design review is where the organization evaluates if the design can meet requirements and if any changes need to be made. Design verification is where the organization has ensured that requirements have been met (e.g. is the widget blue and is it hexagonal?). Design validation is where the organization proves that the design can perform as required.However, the records of design verification, validation, and review do not have to be separate.7.3.3Production and service provisions also extend to how product is preserved, handled, etc., to ensure product conformity. See 7.5.1Design outputs must include requirements related to preservation. See 7.5.5.
7.5.2Notes were added to give examples of the types of processes where this requirement would apply along with a statement that service organizations should have additional considerations in the planning stages when deficiencies and conformity are not likely to be identified prior to delivery.7.5.3Product status must be identified throughout product realization, not just the final product. See 1.2.7.5.4Wording was modified to add clarity, but the intent of the requirement has not changed.7.5.5Again, emphasis is added that care must be given to preserving the product regardless of where it falls in the realization process.7.6An obsolete reference to another ISO document was replaced.The definition of “monitoring and measuring devices” has been clarified to include equipment and devices that are purposed for monitoring and measuring, regardless of their original or intended purpose.An additional note regarding software was added.8.2.2Document and record requirements were reworded and their placement modified to improve clarity.The reference to the auditing guidance document was updated (i.e. ISO 19011).
8.2.3Wording was modified to emphasize that correction and corrective actions are not only to be taken to preserve the conformity of the product, but also to preserve the quality management system. For example, internal rejection/scrap rates could show evidence that the organization is preserving product conformity and is taking intermediate action to prevent bad product from being shipped to their customers; however, it could also be a sign that the organization is not efficient since the higher rejection/scrap rates are undesirable.A note was added to clarify the meaning of “suitable methods” related to planning, monitoring and measurement processes. Suitability should be determined based on risk and the impact that nonconformity would have on the product or process.8.2.4Product can be released to other internal processes despite planned arrangements not being satisfactorily completed as long as it conforms prior to release to the customer. This relaxes requirements on intermediate inspection results and records.8.3Actions taken against nonconforming product must be proportional to its impact or potential impact. See 8.2.3 related to impact considerations for monitoring and measurement.This would mean that in the planning stages of a product, the organization needs to customize responses to nonconforming products based on the risk or potential risk to the organization.This requirement existed in ISO 9001:2000; however, its location has changed.
8.5.2Nonconformity can have multiple causes (“cause”; i.e. a singular reason, was used in the 2000 version); therefore, the organization must consider this when conducting root cause analysis.Also, it is not enough to simply review corrective action and ensure that procedures were changed, personnel have been re-trained, and that processes were amended. The organization must review whether or not the action(s) taken were effective; i.e. did they successfully eliminate the nonconforming condition?8.5.3Similar to the new emphasis on the effectiveness of corrective action, the organization must also document whether or not the preventive action(s) taken were effective in eliminating the risk of nonconformity.